A long, vomity cover story appeared within Time’s September 16, 2013, issue. It
suggested that we take the most spoiled and privileged athletes on any
collegiate campus, who almost never have to pay for a dollar of their
education, and pay them on top of tuition, books, and room and board, to the
tune of about $225,000 a year.
The author (Sean Gregory) writes that an “uncomfortable
question has surfaced.” The problem, as he sees it, is that there is this game
called football and it’s very, very popular. So popular, in fact, that people
pay to watch it, even when it’s only a couple of college teams playing. So
popular, that the crowds are large enough to support businesses that rely on
the crowd’s support and addiction to this game. The university prizes the
football players and they are rewarded for it in the form of full-ride
scholarships, which, in turn, give them a great college education for free. For
free, that’s worth writing one more time. The average college student graduates
with $26,600 in financial debt. The problem here is not the debt of the vast
majority of college students, but that college teams aren’t paying their
football players a salary of $225,000 a year.
The notion throughout the article is that these football and
basketball players are 21st century slaves and since they perform
for a mass audience they should be rewarded. High school football players in
Texas perform for mass audiences, some much bigger than collegiate football
crowds. Should we pay them too? Gregory never answers that question, but of
course we shouldn’t pay them. They are volunteering to play sports. And, in
college, they are volunteering again, although this time they get the perk of
having a free education worth more than $100,000 these days.
Gregory quotes several professors in his article. One of
them being Roger Noll, “a noted sports economist from Stanford University.”
Noll is quoted as saying, “The rising dollar value of the exploitation of
athletes…is obscene, is out of control.” Even if I believed this was an
accurate statement, I wouldn’t think paying the student in addition to their
scholarship would be the solution. How about dialing back the football madness?
As the popularity of the NFL has grown, the importance of collegiate football
has also risen, putting a bigger and brighter spotlight on major collegiate
teams and their star players. If we are looking to exploit them further, then,
by all means, pay them a salary. Let the endorsement battles begin. I am sure
this will only emphasize the importance of the college education they are
already getting for free.
What especially kills me about all of this talk is that the
players complaining to Time that
their likeness is being used by the NCAA to sell jerseys, video games, etc. are
often the players who are going to sign professional contracts after
graduating. Meaning, they’ll soon be making millions in a year or over the span
of their career. These are not needy people; they are some of the most-spoiled
people on collegiate campuses who devalue their education to the extent that
they feel they have seen zero dollars in compensation.
One of the biggest, erroneous claims in this article is that
these players spend forty hours a week on their sports. This just is not true.
In fact, it is illegal for players to formally spend this much time on their
sports. Countable hours cannot exceed 20 a week. True, athletes are free to go
home and study football plays and video, if that is all they want to do. One
player complained in the article that he was spending more time on sports than
academics. Well, that’s really his choice, but has anyone done some on-campus
research or some Googling? If they had, they would realize that the vast
majority of college students playing NCAA D-I football would prefer to spend
more time on sports than on academics. Paying them will make this equation even
more lopsided.
Look, these players aren’t victims, like this article
suggests. They are cogs in a very profitable machine and they are being paid as
such. Full-ride scholarship? Check. Books? Oh those are free. Your portion of
the rent check? Don’t worry, the living stipend is in the mail. Line at the bar
long? Let me usher you to the front. Drinks are sort of pricey tonight? This round’s
on the house. Get a good sack in today’s game? Oh, here’s $300. (Read Sports Illustrated’s article about
playing football at Oklahoma State University.) You have an 8am class? Coach
will be up to usher you there in the morning. You have to go to study tables (where
student-athletes are required to study on the clock, that is, if they are dumb
and can’t sustain above a 3.0) but you really want to stay at the apartment and
play Grand Theft Auto V. Don’t worry,
when you walk in and sign in I’ll look away so I don’t see you walk out and
then later I’ll sign you out so you get the hours. (This happens everywhere.) Shoes
are looking worn? Come on in, I’ll hook you up with a new pair.
Here’s a favorite passage from the article:
And don’t imagine for a moment that universities harvest their athletes’ celebrity for only four years. After a truly memorable championship season, veterans are brought back to campus on a regular basis for reunions and tributes, sometimes for decades. The work never ends.
The work never ends?
What the hell? I didn’t know voluntarily coming back to campus, having travel
costs covered, wining and dining with the AD and the president of the
university, and getting a standing ovation at halftime was work. Shit. Sign me
up.
1 comment:
Wow. Can't wait to read this article. The "exploitation" of the student athlete?! Oh that is rich.
Post a Comment